Former President Trump is recommending that the D.C. arguing that he is immune from punishment due to presidential immunity, the Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals should dismiss the federal case alleging him of interfering with the election. No president, living or dead, can face criminal charges for actions taken while in office unless they are impeached and found guilty by the Senate, according to Trump’s legal team. The Supreme Court declined to get involved in the case, which involves allegations of conspiracy to defraud the United States among other things. Oral arguments are scheduled for January 9.
Trump’s Legal Argument
Briefed by the D.C. Trump’s attorneys claim that the indictment against him is illegal and unconstitutional in the Federal Circuit. They argue that Trump’s immunity from prosecution for activities performed while in office is supported by the government’s structure, the wording of the constitution, and past precedents.
The legal team representing Trump insists that the case ought to be dropped, pointing out that the efforts to rig the 2020 election fell inside the “outer perimeter” of his formal presidential duties.
Because the Supreme Court declined to get involved, the D.C. Oral arguments in the Circuit are scheduled for January, providing a possible turning point in the legal dispute.
READ ALSO: Colorado Justices Receive Threats After Ruling Trump Ineligible For 2024 Ballot
Legal Battle Overview
Special counsel Jack Smith, overseeing the case, sought swift resolution from the Supreme Court regarding Trump’s immunity for election interference during his presidency.
Trump criticized Smith’s request, labeling it a “desperate attempt” to undermine the Constitution. The former president expressed anticipation for the upcoming appeals court arguments.
Trump faces multiple criminal prosecutions, but the election interference case takes center stage as the legal wrangling continues.