Pittsburgh Synagogue Mass Shooter Trial Begins; Jury to Decide on Death Penalty

The jury for the trial of the Pittsburgh synagogue mass shooter has commenced its deliberations to determine whether the death penalty phase of the trial should proceed. The jury’s primary task is to confirm if the shooter is eligible for the death penalty.

Pittsburgh Synagogue Mass Shooter Trial Begins (Photo: Israel Times)

Pittsburgh Synagogue Mass Shooter’s Case

Robert Bowers, aged 50, was found guilty on June 16 of all 63 charges leveled against him. These charges stem from his heinous act of killing 11 worshippers and injuring six others at Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life synagogue in 2018.

Regrettably, this attack stands as the deadliest assault on Jewish people in the United States. Among the counts, 22 are classified as capital offenses.

In 2018, Pittsburgh synagogue mass shooter Bowers approached the synagogue armed with three handguns and an AR-15 rifle. He initiated gunfire near the entrance and proceeded to open fire on congregants, as testified by witnesses. Ultimately, police shot Bowers multiple times before he surrendered and was taken into custody.

Among the victims of this tragedy were a 97-year-old great-grandmother, an 87-year-old accountant, and a couple who had been married at the synagogue over 60 years ago.

READ ALSO: Mexican Actor Tenoch Huerta Of “Black Panther” Denies Allegations Of Sexual Assault

Pittsburgh Synagogue Mass Shooter Trial Begins

According to CNN, the jury deliberated for approximately an hour before suspending their discussions. Deliberations will recommence on Thursday morning.

During the eligibility phase, prosecutors were required to demonstrate that Pittsburgh synagogue mass shooter Bowers acted with an intentional mental state when committing the crimes, and that at least one aggravating factor is applicable to the mass shooting.

They argued that the shooting exhibited extensive planning and clear intent, which Bowers himself articulated as “All Jews had to die.”

In contrast, the defense aimed to challenge the notion of intent and emphasized Pittsburgh synagogue mass shooter Bowers’ mental health challenges. During the closing arguments on Wednesday, the defense team emphasized that the Pittsburgh synagogue mass shooter’s delusions had consumed his thinking.

The defense focused on establishing that Pittsburgh synagogue mass shooter Bowers’ mental illness rendered him incapable of forming the intent to kill or cause serious harm.

Two medical experts called by the defense testified that Pittsburgh synagogue mass shooter Bowers had been diagnosed with schizophrenia, with one expert also diagnosing him with epilepsy. Other experts attested to signs of these conditions as well as delusions in Bowers.

In response, during the prosecution’s rebuttal argument, attorney Eric Olshan challenged the defense experts’ diagnoses, asserting that Bowers did not suffer from schizophrenia, epilepsy, or delusions.

US District Judge Robert Colville provided instructions to the jurors before the closing arguments, urging them not to draw any negative inferences from Pittsburgh synagogue mass shooter Bowers’ decision not to testify. “You must not draw any adverse inference against him because he did not take the witness stand,” the judge emphasized.

Over the course of more than two weeks, the jury heard from a total of 20 witnesses during this phase of the trial. Should the jury conclude that the Pittsburgh synagogue mass shooter is eligible, the trial will move forward to a final phase called sentencing selection.

READ ALSO: Wichita Hospital Sued After 76-Year-Old Woman Claims Man Sexually Assaulted Her In Hospital Room