Senate’s Stance on Social Security Reform: What You Need to Know

According to Lagradaonline ,  After the House of Representatives passed the Social Security Fairness Act, which seeks to repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO), the bill now heads to the Senate for consideration. The legislation, which aims to protect public service workers from having their Social Security benefits reduced due to their work in both public and private sectors, has gained significant bipartisan support.

Rep. Garret Graves (R-La.), who co-authored the bill, emphasized the urgency of passing the legislation quickly. He voiced concern that attaching the bill to year-end negotiations could lead to unnecessary delays. “Anything else is really putting us on a slow path toward death — and I think it’s intentional,” Graves said. Despite passing with nearly 300 votes in the House, he believes any further delay could diminish the bill’s chances of passing.

In a joint effort, Rep. Graves, Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), and Senators Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) sent a letter to Senate leaders Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), urging them to bring the Social Security Fairness Act to a Senate vote. They argued that this was a historic opportunity to address the challenges faced by nearly 2.5 million retirees impacted by WEP and GPO.

Also Read – Full SNAP Payment Schedule: Up to $1,756 for Eligible Recipients Through December 23

Despite its widespread support, the bill has sparked controversy. Some Republican lawmakers, including Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Wis.), have criticized the method by which the bill passed in the House. The use of a discharge petition allowed members to bypass leadership and force consideration of the bill, a rare maneuver that typically only succeeds with support from members of the majority party. Grothman expressed his disapproval of this approach but did not dispute the content of the bill itself.

Experts, such as Andrew Biggs, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, have raised concerns about the timing and effectiveness of the bill. Biggs explained that while WEP and GPO were created in an era with less data, the current formula may still be reasonable on average. However, the formula may not be fair in every case, and he suggested that instead of eliminating the provisions entirely, lawmakers should consider revising the formula.

The WEP is a formula used to reduce Social Security benefits for individuals who receive pensions from employers that do not withhold Social Security taxes, such as state and local governments or non-U.S. employers. The GPO reduces benefits for spouses of individuals receiving government pensions. The Social Security Fairness Act seeks to eliminate these reductions, providing relief to millions of public service workers.

The post Senate’s Stance on Social Security Reform: What You Need to Know appeared first on Alamogordo Local News.

Source link